scientists make lousy metaphors, referring to umbilical cords and kitchen sponges, then non-sponge all in reference to the same cosmic phenomenon. Puhlease! We tossed the question to a group of experimental philosophers to see what they could come up after experimenting for an afternoon.
Experimental Philosophers Data: Cosmic Frog Eggs 17%, Cherry Pie Filling 22%, Cosmic Candy Buttons 4%, Natural Sponge Marks 0%, Cosmic Bokeh 43% Astronomical Scabies 45%, One of Six Star Trek Episodes where they Run into this kind of Goo 80%. As scientists we didn't just come with an answer to the question, we came up with Data that goes all round the question with no definite conclusion. Knube said "Now that's real science!"
Note that numbers do not add to 100 percent. We haven't a fuckin clue why, we're philosophers for Christ sake.
Experimental Philosophers Data: Cosmic Frog Eggs 17%, Cherry Pie Filling 22%, Cosmic Candy Buttons 4%, Natural Sponge Marks 0%, Cosmic Bokeh 43% Astronomical Scabies 45%, One of Six Star Trek Episodes where they Run into this kind of Goo 80%. As scientists we didn't just come with an answer to the question, we came up with Data that goes all round the question with no definite conclusion. Knube said "Now that's real science!"
Note that numbers do not add to 100 percent. We haven't a fuckin clue why, we're philosophers for Christ sake.